Pyrrhonian skepticism

Have you ever wondered why some people swear by horoscopes while others dismiss them without a second thought? That tension between belief in predictions and healthy skepticism is nothing new. In the sixteenth century, the French thinker Michel de Montaigne grappled with exactly the same questions — and he did so by drawing on a rich tradition of classical philosophy, from the Roman Stoics to the Greek skeptics. In this article, we explore the philosophical sources that fed Montaigne’s thinking when he wrote his famous essay on divination and prophecy. The Renaissance Humanist in His Tower Library Picture Montaigne in his celebrated tower study, surrounded by thousands of books lining the walls from floor to ceiling. Each volume bore his handwritten inscriptions and annotations. This was no mere decoration — it was a living dialogue with the past. As a true Renaissance humanist, Montaigne believed that the wisdom of the ancients remained profoundly relevant to his own age. He was no passive reader: he questioned, compared, and drew conclusions that often feel strikingly modern. The humanism of the Renaissance was characterized by a return to classical sources. Where medieval scholars had often worked through commentaries and summaries, the humanists read […]